The Supreme Court ruling on state social media laws could shape broader tech regulation
The social media landscape is changing as lawmakers become more active in shaping digital communication
Experts are concerned a patchwork of state laws would fail to address the problem of kids online safety.
Although many experts agree TikTok poses a threat, some believe a ban is the wrong solution.
The Surgeon General called on Congress to take action against the harms social media poses to youth.
A wide range of tech industry associations and civil liberties advocates applauded the decision to leave Section 230 untouched.
TikTok addressed the revelation that employees tracked the physical location of at least one U.S. journalist.
The Biden administration announced $140 million in new funding for national AI research.
The $200 billion industry specifically targets children and other vulnerable populations, experts said.
House lawmakers presented a united front against TikTok as calls for a national ban gain momentum.
States are considering measures ranging from age verification to a “duty of care.”
Watch the start of the Big Tech & Speech Summit from March 9. Sign up for full webcast.
Reforming Section 230 may not ‘break the internet,’ but experts recommended that changes be targeted and incremental.
Bills ranged from addressing intermediary liability to limiting personal data collection.
Panelists disagreed over the merits of Section 230’s protections and the extent to which they apply.
The court has not yet agreed to hear the cases, but multiple justices have commented on their importance.
Campus TikTok bans could have negative consequences for students.
Existing digital privacy concerns are amplified in an environment designed to fully immerse users.
Rep. Ken Buck said tech companies’ practices are anticompetitive and threaten innovation, free speech and national security.
Without Section 230, platforms whose actions are legally justified could be subject to ruinous lawsuits.
When the influencer is given freedom to shape the advertisements, her followers will perceive the campaign as authentic.
Lack of enforcement has led to gray area surrounding endorsement advertising, especially from 'microcelebrities.'
'We’re seeing the pace and the sophistication of the ransomware attacks increasing faster than our resilience.'
How will Elon Musk's acquisition of Twitter and Ye's acquisition of Parler shape the social media landscape?
'We have every reason to believe the Justices will ... agree to hear this case,' said CCIA President Matt Schruers
Georgetown University professor Randy Barnett said that the ability to post on social media might be a civil right.
Two information technology industry groups are trying to stall implementation of Texas’ social media law.
The White House released a "comprehensive framework" for the regulation of digital assets.
Microsoft and CWA plan to host a traveling series of events promoting the ACP subsidy.
FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr is requesting Apple and Google remove the TikTok app over data concerns.
A March Gallup and Knight study found young Americans are less concerned about hurtful online discourse.
Observers on a Broadband Breakfast panel offered differing perspectives on the high court's decision.
The decision resulted in an unusual court split. Justice Kagan sided with Justice Alito but refused to sign his dissent.
What should state leaders be doing to procure a safer, healthier information environment?
Parler's Amy Peikoff said she wishes Twitter can follow in her social media company's footsteps.
Senator Edward Markey has been a proponent of increasing the age group in child privacy laws for years.
Social media platforms are harming Iran due to their ignorance of Iranian culture and the nation's primary dialects.
And the CEO of the Anti-Defamation League calls for Section 230 reform.
A Texas court blocked enforcement of a social media that would prevent companies from removing extreme speech.
Facebook is under fire. Does that mean all of social media should be?
